Skip to main content
(866) 465-5395 Schedule a Consultation (866) 465-5395 Schedule a Consultation

Spousal Support And Marital Settlement Agreements

| |

In an opinion issued on March 20, 2014, a Dauphin County judge upheld and explained his prior order denying an ex-husband’s request that he be entirely discharged from paying alimony to his ex-wife.  The case was Eugene v. Eugene. The ex-husband had asked for discharge of his alimony obligation, which was outlined in his written Marital Settlement Agreement, because it was allegedly impossible for him to make the payments under the agreed method of payment.

History of the Case

The Agreement stated that his payments were to be made via direct auto-drafts from his bank account to PaSCDU (Pennsylvania State Collection and Disbursement Unit).  However, the auto-drafts did not happen because PaSCDU required his Social Security number to appear on the payment checks, but his bank refused to do so to prevent identity theft.

In addition to explaining the method for alimony payments, the spouses’ Agreement provided that if the husband failed to make timely payments, the alimony provision could be “referred to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County for enforcement pursuant to its Domestic Relations Office and/or any other relief available under support, alimony or divorce law.”

Petitioning to Enforce Spousal Support

After the ex-husband missed payments, his ex-wife filed a Petition to Enforce the terms of their Agreement. After the resulting hearing, the judge issued an order revising the Agreement’s terms to require him to send his alimony checks directly to PaSCDU.

On appeal, the ex-husband raised four issues that revolved around the contract doctrine of impossibility and the court’s alleged failure to analyze the case as a contract matter, not a divorce matter.

The court first addressed its method of analysis first, explaining that a divorce agreement is “governed by the law of contracts unless the agreement provides otherwise.” Here, because the parties’ Agreement specifically stated that in the event of a breach, the alimony provision could be referred to the Court for enforcement and/or relief, the Court appropriately analyzed the issue under divorce law. Moreover, under PA divorce law, a court cannot modify alimony terms where they have been reach by agreement of the parties, unless the agreement says so. Therefore, the alimony obligation could not be modified, much less completely discharged.

Court Denies Husband’s Request for Entire Discharge from Alimony

The court then addressed the ex-husband’s claim of contract impossibility. First, the court denied Husband’s request because procedurally, husband waived his impossibility claim by making three payments in a method other than that outlined in the Marital Settlement Agreement. The court then ruled that his claim failed on the merits, because the method of his payments was “clearly not a basic assumption upon which the Agreement was reached but was a minor logistical provision intended to effectuate the parties’ primary intent, which was that husband pay wife alimony.”  The court cited language in the Agreement to show that the parties’ intent was for husband to pay alimony.

This case is a great example of the importance of what details and language are included in marital settlement agreements (also called property settlement agreements). If you are contemplating a divorce that will involve claims of property distribution or alimony and support, you should contact a spousal support attorney who can ensure your rights are protected. The family law attorneys at Petrelli Previtera do just that!

Client Testimonials

They are amazing! I highly recommend anyone that is in need of assistance with child support hearings to seek out the expertise and experience of this law firm and staff! They handled my case quickly and I feel that my money was put to good use. Much appreciated! Nothing less than five stars!

Alana Deverson

I just want to say GREAT JOB! She is a no nonsense professional with years of experience that qualifies her as a skilled Family Law attorney. She is seasoned, sensitive, and most of all she cares. She made things easy for me. Definitely recommend!

Kimberly Colby

Overall I was pleased with the results of my divorce case. The entire Petrelli Previtera team truly cares about their clients. Luckily for me, I was paired up with an amazing team helping all the way. If you happen to work with this firm and with the lawyers you’ll be in great hands. It was such an excellent service and it was beyond I expected.

A Family Law Client Chevy Chase , MD

Serving Clients at the Following Locations

Bethesda4800 Hampden Lane, Suite 200 Bethesda MD 20814(301) 234-7409view details
Maryland5425 Wisconsin Ave Chevy Chase, MD 20815(301) 889-8085view details
ChicagoTwo Prudential Plaza 180 North Stetson Suite 3500 Chicago, IL 60601(312) 252-2085view details
Schaumburg1750 E. Golf Rd, Suite 382 Schaumburg, IL 60173(630) 491-9670view details
Texas500 W 2nd St Suite 1900 Austin, TX 78701(512) 883-1684view details
Washington DC1717 K Street NW, Suite 900 Washington DC 20006(202) 519-0366view details
Denver7900 E. Union Ave. Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80237(720) 821-6440view details
Princeton475 Wall St, Suite 214, Princeton, NJ 08540(609) 917 9560view details
Linwood210 New Road #15 Linwood, NJ 08221(609) 375-0351view details
Parsippany8 Campus Dr, Parsippany, NJ 07054(973) 310-5320view details
Philadelphia1845 Walnut Street 19th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103(215) 523-6900view details
Montgomery County516 DeKalb Street Suite C Norristown, PA 19401(610) 924-2870view details
Doylestown123 N Broad Street, Doylestown, PA 18901(267) 938-4480view details
Abington1147 Easton Road, Abington PA 19001(610) 890-4833view details
West Chester203 W. Chestnut St., Suite 204
West Chester, PA. 19380
(610) 431-4012view details
schedule a consultation Today
Contact Us Fill out the form or call us today (866) 465-5395